Select Page

September 6th 2012 – Back to Work

by | Sep 5, 2012 | Archived Material, September 2012

Good Afternoon,

I finally settled my father’s Estate and all family disputes on Friday, August 24th (basically 2 weeks ago).    After the fallout, I needed some downtime to finally grieve the death and “get over” the family drama.  I realized that because of the way that I have set up my life and who it is that I associate with, I rarely have “drama” to deal with.  I realized how much I truly have grown past this constant “American nonsense” where families and people constantly bicker over the MINUTIA OF LIFE and pretend that they have something (or have some alleged right or rights); while the USA/UN/UK/VATICAN MATRIX SYSTEM continues its onslaught and continues to move forward to certain annihilation and/or tyrannical controls over people that do not exercise the Right of Self Determination.

So, I have been through the grieving and the strife and more than ever I realize that “I don’t have time for the nonsense”… because “everyone is running out of time”…and “time is always of the essence”.  Morpheus (Laurence Fishburne) said it best in the first MATRIX movie: “Time is always against us”.

So, I apologize for the downtime everyone.  I am sure that every member on MATRIX SOLUTIONS spent that time wisely reviewing International Treaties and Agreements, such as the VIENNA CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF TREATIES and/or DIPLOMATIC or CONSULAR RELATIONS….and the reason that you would be continually studying and becoming better would be that you realize (got some real eyes) that you’re gonna need 10,000 hours to become an expert in order to “set up and run a Nation/State” and “acquire Standing and be able to Stand”…because you further under-Stand the words of H.L. Mencken;

The fact is that the average man’s love of liberty is nine-tenths imaginary, exactly like his love of sense, justice and truth. He is not actually happy when free; he is uncomfortable, a bit alarmed, and intolerably lonely. Liberty is not a thing for the great masses of men. It is the exclusive possession of a small and disreputable minority, like knowledge, courage and honor. It takes a special sort of man to understand and enjoy liberty– and he is usually an outlaw in democratic societies. — Baltimore Evening Sun, Feb. 12, A. D. 1923

Now, I am going to make an admission here.  Some other issues have come up that may require me to travel either this week or next.  But, I gained a “deeper” perspective about life through my downtime; and I have a renewal of energy.  Therefore, for this month; since we are coming up on the release of the DVDs, new marketing strategies and the beginning of what will likely be a radio blitz campaign to “get the word out” about “getting out”…I am going to “blog your socks off” (even if I do have to travel).  If you were on the last conference call 2 weeks ago; you know that I went for 4 hours non-stop (more than worth some measly 27 bucks and which I will post).  You also heard me mention that there are “blogs/material” in cue waiting to go up on MATRIX SOLUTIONS.  I just needed some space for a while and apparently a new or renewal impetus/stimulus.  I have that now…and you will start hearing it in the next blogs.

However, for today I am going to keep it simple and get back to basics; i.e. that “Citizens have no rights, only the privileges that are granted by their Sovereign or Government”, and “There are only 2 types of people on Planet Earth. 1) Those who are exercising Stewardship with Immunity (by agreement) and 2) those that are doing busyness with no Immunity”.   To that end, I am posting an email that I received over the Labor Day Weekend; followed by the reply I sent out to the email.  The email is about several issues, but these are the chief ones.

1. It’s about an International Treaty, and

2.  who has or does not have “rights” to the Treaty/Contract/Agreement.

3. It’s also about an alleged controversial use of the word: Person.

4. It’s about who can and who cannot “reserve rights”, based on failure to understand where all rights come from; so…

5. It’s about perception and misperception of Status and Standing, and

6. a failure to under-Stand that all people on this Planet who do not exercise the Right of Self Determination are either serving or subject to those that already have and DO.

(Caveat: PD in the jpeg at the top = PUBLIC DOMAIN)

(Caveat: Item No. 6 in the list (above) is with the exception of what I/we have and are setting up, because I/we don’t want citizens/subjects/slaves.  Instead, I/we are looking for “peaceful, diplomatic warriors” that understand the meaning of this jpeg image (left). If you like being subject-citizen-debtor-slaves and are not willing to “pledge” in order to be free and get outside the MATRIX; then, by all means, stay in Uncle Sam’s Club; cuz Sam likes “his” slave-citizenry.)

Enjoy the email exchange and “learn” from it.  This is a taste of my “daily life”…rebutting stupid presumptions.  I am so used to it now; that I constantly laugh at the insanity and how it is that the word “insane, insane person, and lunatic” ended up being the first definitions in the entire US Code.   Understand that rebuttals are made point by point; and paragraph by paragraph.  This is how you debate and defend a position.   Winning a debate or “getting your point across” means that you are the one that has the last word.  It a commercial maxim: “he who leaves the battlefield first; loses”.

BTW…US immigration is still strong.  I wrote that “Sam likes his slaves”.  Can ya tell?

The next segment will be the email I received followed by my responses in segment three and four along with a couple presentations. Enjoy


Here’s the Email  Followed by my Reply

From: R***
Date: Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:13 AM
Subject: Fwd: NOT to be recognized as a person
To: David Williams <david@therightofselfdetermination.com>

What is your opinion of this position?

From: unknown author…someone in Canada, obviously an alleged “freeman”
Date: Mon, Sep 3, 2012
Subject:  NOT to be recognized as a person
To: ***_

Article 6 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Article 16, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights state: Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.

I had thought that any right meant that we have the option; e.g.: we could opt to recognition as a person, or opt NOT to be recognized as a person.

Then, I remembered that the public always presumes and assumes whatever works in its favor, not ours so it is our job to rebut their presumptions or have them prove their assumptions. When we declare or write, All Rights Reserved, we are opting for recognition as a Person, i.e.: a legal fiction, as that is one of our rights. So, unless we WAIVE that particular right, they presume and assume that we have NOT waived it and that we want to be recognized as a person, before the law! YIKES! Is this the sole cause of all our problems?

The International Bill of Human Rights (IBHR) is made up of three main documents, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).

In these documents are our human rights which we can opt to assert or waive.

If we have a right to recognition as a person, then a person must be something that we are NOT. We put the government on Lawful Notice and either assert or waive our intrinsic natural and human rights according to our will. Then, we will be free and we will also be able to access our birthright our dominion over all the earth and every living thing upon it. (If you want the Declaration, email me at: *******@gmail.com)

This notice will be served on many government officials and it ought to remove us from all court cases (except Civil Court cases), which are all administrative, i.e.: offers of contract, and involve only Persons. I suspect this will be the answer to all problems involving a legal fiction coming against us, whom they presume to be legal fictions, until we say otherwise, lawfully, prior to a court date, in a Lawful Notice. It seems the entire game is all about status and, again, if we let them know who we are NOT, well fair much better than if we allow their presumptions to stand unrebutted, as we are presumed to have contracted with the State or its Courts.

This Declaration is extensive in that it mentions our rights which public servants have sworn to uphold and protect. Their failure to do so is Human Rights Violations and they can be charged, as long as we have waived our right to recognition as a person.

Our previous refusal to be recognized by the Name really is not the core issue, so it doesn’t have the clout of waiving the right to be recognized as a Person because the Name is registered State property and is only what the Person is called. We can BE neither Name nor Person, but by admitting to, or acting as, the Name, we are circuitously, unwittingly, (CCC §19) committing the crime of personation (CCC §403) and presumptively admitting to BEING a person a legal fiction to which all codes, rules, regulations, statutes, ordinances, by-laws, acts, bills, legislation, constitutions, treaties, policies, charters (aka law) apply.

Since, this has yet to be tested in courts, in any court matter involving an offence under an alleged law, all of which apply exclusively to persons, we must prepare an Affidavit or a Lawful Notification, in writing, serving it on all parties, which makes perfectly clear our waiving our human right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law .

This document should be placed in the court file before the matter comes before the court. Then, the court is aware of our waiver of certain of our human rights (again, a right is a choice, otherwise, it is not a right; it is a compulsion).

When we appear in court and the matter is called, we ought to say that I am hereby special appearance to correct a mistake. The Crown appears to believe that I am the party charged and that I am recognized everywhere as a person before the law. This is a mistake and the only reason I am here is to correct it.

If judges do not simply dismiss the charges, then, likely, they will threaten us, in order that we give them the name; but we MUST NOT acquiesce. We now know they are trying to get us to make joinder with the legal name which, if we did, we would be, essentially, expressing our desire to reverse our decision of having waived our human right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.

We could respond by saying, my name is not registered and it is my private property; so, unless you can show me a law which requires me to give you my private property, then I refuse your offer to contract. The Surname belongs to the Crown and the given names belong to us, but when they put both given and surname together, it creates the name they use in order to trick us into submitting to their jurisdiction.

If the judge continues to insist that we provide the court with our name, we could say, I am sorry, but you have not provided me with any proof that I am under any legal obligation to provide you with my private property, but I am curious about why you require it, since my only purpose here today is to assist the court in correcting a mistake. Is the reason you want my name so you can make joinder between me, a man, and your legal name, so you can deem me a person before the law, in order to give you jurisdiction to administer your Statutes and Acts against me?

This really ought to end it. The court cannot possibly find us in contempt of court since we have simply asked a question that the court is apparently not prepared to answer and, if they fail to answer after our asking three times, we can give an answer for them. Your laws apply only to persons, not to Man.

When we successfully avoid giving the court our private property (given names), combined with the waiver of our human right to recognition as a person, we have circumvented their game of deceit and trickery and established that we are NOT a legal person. They have no jurisdiction over Man and they have no legal right to execute their Law against us.

All legal fictions, such as government, lawyers, CRA agents, etc. are our servants, not our authorities


Reply

I will go through this below…in RED…. (and the word “you” is not directed at you, R****; but to whoever wrote this; because I don’t see an author at the bottom but I assume it’s not you.)

>     Article 6 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Article 16, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights state: Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.

Okay….I am just reading and responding.  Hope it’s not a situation of should read everything first…and then respond; because I scrolled to the bottom to see if someone took “authority” for being the “author” of this, but I didn’t read yet.  

The first understanding: “Are you signatory to the treaty”?  Or, are you assuming the “right” based on what someone else “DID FOR YOU”?  The PRIMARY and most simple understanding is this; “those that have not exercised the right of self-determination only have the rights given to them by those that have exercised and are exercising the Right of Self-Determination in order to have the Standing to make any determinations about “Article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights”.

IN other words; someone (or ones…i.e. nation-states…the UN General Assembly…whatever) wrote the INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS.  If you were not at the writing, signing, and “ratification” of the CONTRACT/TREATY…then how does it apply to “you’?  Answer…it does not.  If “you” were not at the “party”…then to become a “party” you must submit an Accession and Adherence Document to become A PARTY to the CONTRACT.   That is done by THE STATE….not the individual.  Once “your State” or the “State that you belong to” does this….then you have the “right”.  But, as a citizen and actually “belonging to a State”…then it is a “granted civil privilege” that the “State that you belong to” can UN-GRANT.

There is a difference between “your State” and “the State to which you BELONG”.

>     I had thought that any right meant that we have the option; e.g.: we could opt to recognition as a person, or opt NOT to be recognized as a person.

Had a thought?  Thinking is not knowing

>     Then, I remembered that the public always presumes and assumes whatever works in its favour, not ours so it is our job to rebut their presumptions or have them prove their assumptions. When we declare or write, All Rights Reserved, we are opting to recognition as a Person, i.e.: a legal fiction, as that, is one of our rights.  So, unless we WAIVE that particular right, they presume and assume that we have NOT waived it and that we want to be recognized as a person, before the law! YIKES! Is this the sole cause of all our problems?

If you are a “citizen”…you have no rights; the Sovereign does not have to prove “jack” to you.  According to International Law….the Right of Self Determination is the foundation of ALL OTHER RIGHTS.  Therefore, writing “all rights reserved” means nothing….since you have no rights.  Therefore, “this” is not the sole cause of “your” problem or problems.

If you would like to see how this “disclaimer” that you are calling “All Rights Reserved” plays out in Commercial Law (as just one example); then look at the Uniform Commercial Code of any State within the United States (and it will be true of any Nation/State involved in Commercial…because Uniform Commerce is GLOBAL).

UCC 5-103(c):

(c)  With the exception of this subsection, subsections (a) and (d), Sections 5-102(a)(9) and (10), 5-106(d), and 5-114(d), and except to the extent prohibited in Sections 1-302 and 5-117(d), the effect of this article may be varied by agreement or by a provision stated or incorporated by reference in an undertaking.  A term in an agreement or undertaking generally excusing liability or generally limiting remedies for failure to perform obligations is not sufficient to vary obligations prescribed by this article.

This means that “you” cannot vary your “citizenship” agreement (or the alleged “rights” thereunder) by simply writing a Caveat or Disclaimer on a sheet of paper such as “Void Where Prohibited” or “All Rights Reserved”….and more especially a Treaty/Contract when “you” are NOT A SIGNATORY.

>     The International Bill of Human Rights (IBHR) is made up of three main documents, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). In these documents are our human rights which we can opt to assert or waive.

You “assert or waive” only with permission of your master…ie. the one that signed the CONTRACT.


>     If we have a right to recognition as a person, then a person must be something that we are NOT. We put the government on Lawful Notice and either assert or waive our intrinsic natural and human rights according to our will. Then, we will be free and we will also be able to access our birthright our dominion over all the earth and every living thing upon it. (If you want the Declaration, email me at: *************22@gmail.com)

What are “intrinsic, natural, human rights”?  What is the “exercise of your will”?  To ‘SELF GOVERN”?   Prove to me “your birthright”….what is that…what are your “birthright”?   Who said that you had a “birthright”?  Where’s the contract?   What makes you “think” that you have some “birthright” that you could not possibly understand when you were born….and therefore “mommy” pledged you into bondage.  IN CONTRACT….you have one huge “right”….which is the right to “contract” all of your rights away.  That was done at your birth since you were born “incompetent” or “non compos mentis”.   The only way out of the “condition” that you were born into is THE RIGHT OF SELF DETERMINATION.   Since you are not a “self-determining” and “self-governing” Individual or Person (or whatever)…then you have not “rebutted any assumption/presumption or CONTRACT” and therefore (as the Ancient Maxim states)…RES IPSA LOQUITOR….i.e. THE THING SPEAKS FOR ITSELF.  

You were born a slave, Neo.  Didn’t you receive the PRIORITY NOTICE?

Yes….I would love to have a copy of THE DECLARATION.  This one I gotta see.

>     This notice will be served on many government officials and it ought to remove us from all court cases (except Civil Court cases), which are all administrative, i.e.: offers of contract, and involve only Persons. I suspect this will be the answer to all problems involving a legal fiction coming against us, whom they presume to be legal fictions, until we say otherwise, lawfully, prior to a court date, in a Lawful Notice. It seems the entire game is all about status and, again, if we let them know who we are NOT, we’ll fare much better than if we allow their presumptions to stand unrebutted, as we are presumed to have contracted with the State or its Courts.

Who said that “Government Officials” are “legal fictions”?  Who said the “State” or its “Courts” are fictions?  A “fiction” means “something that is not Real” or “something that is not a fact”.  Are you saying that the “State”; which signed the Contract/Treaty….and its Courts which enforce (in force) the State’s Treaties/Contracts…are not Real or a Fact?  Who said that these things are “legal fictions”?   Who got you to ‘buy that crap”?   They are “legal entities” created by an AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PARTIES of the agreement….and the last time I checked; CONTRACTS ARE REAL.  In fact, Contracts are so real; it’s the reason you wrote you a dissertation on what “ought” to remove you from court cases…and what you “suspect” might be an answer to ALL PROBLEMS…and what it “SEEMS” to you to be the ENTIRE GAME.

This is not objective thinking.  Everything you have written here is subjective because you do not know THE ENTIRE GAME…..not even close.

And BTW….Morpheus told Neo plainly: “If you die in the Matrix, you die in the REAL WORLD”.  So, I suggest you start dealing with this like your life depends on it; because it does.

>     This Declaration is extensive in that it mentions our rights which public servants have sworn to uphold and protect. Their failure to do so is Human Rights Violations and they can be charged, as long as we have waived our right to recognition as a person.

You do not have any “servants”. The “servants” serve the Sovereign (power/authority).  That ain’t you.   So where are you going to take this International Human Rights violation?  You going to file at the Hague with the ICJ.?? (that’s International Court of Justice…where “States” file claims for such violations).  

You have no “international Standing”; therefore any “violation” of your alleged “human rights” would have to be brought by the State to which you belong.  However, since you would be alleging that it would be “your” State’s agents/servants that violated you….you would be asking the State to sue itself at the Hague for such violations.  Does this sound plausible to you?

>     Our previous refusal to be recognized by the Name really is not the core issue, so it doesn’t have the clout of waiving the right to be recognized as a Person, because the Name is registered State property and is only what the Person is called. We can BE neither Name nor Person, but by admitting to, or acting as, the Name, we are circuitously, unwittingly, (CCC §19) committing the crime of personation (CCC §403) and presumptively admitting to BEING a person a legal fiction to which all codes, rules, regulations, statutes, ordinances, by-laws, acts, bills, legislation, constitutions, treaties, policies, charters (aka law) apply.

Please,….you’re a citizen of Canada.  All Canadian Codes, rules, regulations, statutes, ordinances, by-laws, acts, bills, legislation, constitutions, treaties, policies, charters (aka law) apply to you.  STOP PRETENDING THAT THEY DON’T.

Better yet….pray tell me…what does apply to you?

>     Since, this has yet to be tested in courts, in any court matter involving an offence under an alleged law, all of which apply exclusively to persons, we must prepare an Affidavit or a Lawful Notification, in writing, serving it on all parties, which makes perfectly clear our waiving our human right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law .

Yet to be tested?   Let me know how this works for you.

NO…Stop the presses.  Let me tell you how it’s going to work.  A bunch of “you folks” will do said Affidavit and “lawful” Notification and submit it to that (or those) that you claim to “not exist” because they are “Fictions”….thereby, acknowledging “as REAL” that which you claim has no power/authority because it’s a “Fiction that does not exist and is not Real”.   (duh)

Once these “filing” and/or “notices” begin.  Some of you will “violate” some “statute, code, rule, or reg” and will end up in court.   The court system will create a dragnet….meaning a percentage of you will win.   Since this will be seen as success…you will begin to “preach this religion” that this Affidavit and Notification are the most powerful documents in the land.  That these 2 documents are “your key to freedom” and “your way out of the tyranny of the Fictitious Matrix System”

In this way…those that you claim are “fictitious” and “not real” and “do not exist….will start keeping a record of all of the dissenters and “governmental anarchist” …so that you ALL can later be rounded up and brought in a later round of what you will call….”see THEY do follow any rules….THEY are just evil….and THEY are just violators of my “god/document-given rights”.

This is the “governmental, commercial DRAGNET”…..and as they say….”been there, done that”; or…the second verse is the same as the first”.

>     This document should be placed in the court file before the matter comes before the court. Then, the court is aware of our waiver of certain of our human rights (again, a right is a choice, otherwise, it is not a right; it is a compulsion).

The Court is only interested in the CONTRACT.  What is the Contract before the Court?  That is the only issue and the “citizenship” contract is where it all starts.  If you are a Canadian; THEY have the authority/jurisdiction…BY CONTRACT.

You were born a slave, Neo.   Remember?  THEY TOLD YOU UPFRONT.

But, THEY also told you (showed you) that there is ONLY ONE KEY THAT FITS ONE DOOR.  You want out of the MATRIX….then read LAW OF NATIONS, Book 1, Sections 32 and 33.  And then study the RIGHT OF SELF DETERMINATION.  The “keymaker” was called “the Exile” for a reason.

>     When we appear in court and the matter is called, we ought to say that I am hereby special appearance to correct a mistake. The Crown appears to believe that I am the party charged and that I am recognized everywhere as a person before the law. This is a mistake and the only reason I am here is to correct it.

Not tested yet?  I can’t wait to hear the stories on this one.

>     If judges do not simply dismiss the charges, then, likely, they will threaten us, in order that we give them the name; but we MUST NOT acquiesce. We now know they are trying to get us to make joinder with the legal name which, If we did, we would be, essentially, expressing our desire to reverse our decision of having waived our human right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.

THEY already have joinder….you belong to THEIR State or STATE.

>     We could respond by saying, my name is not registered and it is my private property; so, unless you can show me a law which requires me to give you my private property, then I refuse your offer to contract. The Surname belongs to the Crown and the given names belong to us, but when they put both given and surname together, it creates the name they use in order to trick us into submitting to their jurisdiction.

Fallacy.!!  You have “NO PRIVATE PROPERTY”.   You are using “Your Master’s Property”.  The MATRIX has you, Neo.

>     If the judge continues to insist that we provide the court with our name, we could say, I am sorry, but you have not provided me with any proof that I am under any legal obligation to provide you with my private property, but I am curious about why you require it, since my only purpose here today is to assist the court by correcting a mistake. is the reason you want my name so you can make joinder between me, a man, and your legal name, so you can Deem me a person before the law, in order to give you jurisdiction to administer your Statutes and Acts against me?

Not tested yet ….

>     This really ought to end it. The court cannot possibly find us in contempt of court since we have simply asked a question that the court is apparently not prepared to answer and, if they fail to answer after our asking three times, we can give an answer for them. Your laws apply only to persons, not to Man.

Ought?  This is your “legal theory”?   Where’s your conviction man?   Shouldn’t this say “this will end it…and once you do this, just thank the Honorable for his time and turn and walk out;…or better yet….request permission to leave the Honorable’s Commissioned Vessel Admiralty Courtroom?”

If THEY fail 3 times…!!??  Wow….a game.   Like baseball….3 strikes and you’re out.   


>     When we successfully avoid giving the court our private property (given names), combined with the waiver of our human right to recognition as a person, we have circumvented their game of deceit and trickery and established That we are NOT a legal person. They have no jurisdiction over Man and they have no legal right to execute their Law against us. All legal fictions, such as government, lawyers, CRA agents, etc. are our servants, not our authorities.

Wow….you have “servants”.  You were born with servants to “serve you”.  Well, aren’t you special?   Why don’t you just ask “your servants” to draft these “OH, SO NECESSARY” documents up for you….and have “your servants” deliver it to THEIR COURT?

Okay R*****…I know you didn’t write this and my reply is obviously a tad verbose.  But, whoever wrote this needs to read my reply….because they are in for a world of hurt if they choose that path.  They have no remedy.

hope you’re well

david

Remember this one:

Theodore Roosevelt
Jamestown Exposition April 26,1907

it behooves us to remember that men can never escape being governed. Either they must govern themselves or they must submit to being governed by others. If from lawlessness or fickleness, from folly or self-indulgence, they refuse to govern themselves, then most assuredly in the end they will have to be governed from the outside. They can prevent the need of government from without only by showing that they possess the power of government from within, a sovereign can not make excuses for his failures; a sovereign must accept the responsibility for the exercise of the power that inheres in him

Remember the question…and make it burn into your mind…What makes you better than everyone else on the Planet?  What makes you better than the Illuminati and the Bankers and the Politicians….that you have accepted as your Governors and Masters and with who you’re in COLLUSION?   Personalize this.  You’re involved in fraud and murder and you know it…and until you get disgusted enough about it to do EVERYTHING YOU CAN to “get out of the Matrix”; then accept that you will never get out.  I did…and if I can then anyone can.

Bottom line…This Ain’t Rocket Science….it’s about Honor and Intent.  You only have to figure out one thing….WHAT REALLY MAKES YOU TICK….inside.  That’s how you “fix” the outside.  THEY left the “door” open because THEY had to…in in accordance with the Universal Public Order.  Now…what will you do?


 

Presentation

[smartvideo_divi_module video_src=”another_source” another_source=”https://drive.google.com/file/d/1teLuX8YdkcgQSTDf-19Id0VOflCmzwkM/view?usp=sharing” poster_src=”media_library” internal_poster=”https://www.deprogrammingseries.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/norightsreserved1-600×207.png” admin_label=”SmartVideo” _builder_version=”4.4.5″][/smartvideo_divi_module]

LINKS

DOWNLOADS

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

© Copyright 2020 | Associated with MSNetwork Community | All Rights Reserved.  
Clicky